VW Vortex - Volkswagen Forum banner
1 - 20 of 39 Posts

TurboWraith

· Registered
Joined
·
11,798 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I dont -think- this has been posted, but I wont be surprised if it has been. I searched for 'revetech' and didnt find anything so here goes.
Sort of a new take on a boxter engine, though they tossed in some bits that look like they came out of a rotory engine, and it doesnt rev very high, but it sounds pretty sweet.
Revetech
They claim that many existing parts (such as valvetrains - etc) can be used on these things, they have less moving parts, no side load on the piston/cylinder walls, and a 4 cyl engine has 6 power strokes per one crank revoltution. If fitted with a different rotor it can have 10.
Image
This allows for an assload of torque compared to standard engines of simalar displacement.
Anyway, makes a good read - and its very cool to see someone thinking outside the box.
Image


Image

and a still of the internals...
Image



Modified by TurboWraith at 4:10 PM 8-10-2006
 
Discussion starter · #3 ·
Re: New engine design - Revetech (GsR)

Quote, originally posted by GsR »
hmm...very interesting idea
Image

I want to see how far it will go.
Image

yup, might have the potential to be something someday. though i dont see many manufactuers instrested in spending money on a new engine design when they would rather be trying to find ways to do the hybrid thing or whatever else.
 
Re: New engine design - Revetech (Numbersix)

I'm not terribly mechanically savvy, so I have no 'opinion' on this, other than to say it sure looks cool.
Image
(hey, at least I'm honest!)
 
Re: New engine design - Revetech (Arsigi)

Looks like my indian relatives are good at things other then working for Dell's technical support!
Image
 
Re: New engine design - Revetech (Arsigi)

Quote, originally posted by Arsigi »
I'm not terribly mechanically savvy, so I have no 'opinion' on this, other than to say it sure looks cool.
Image
(hey, at least I'm honest!)

Image
hey i need to read it a few more times to fully understand whats going on. it looks cool, it works. http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif
 
I dunno, a new type of crank and efficiency skyrockets by 60%? That seems way, way too optimistic.
And I wonder how they would extract output from a row of pairs of piston, i.e. an H6 or H8. How do you connect the middle cylinder with a crank shaft?
It seems like you could get an H4 to work by getting power from both sides.
Image
 
Re: New engine design - Revetech (TurboWraith)

Actually, I think the concept sounds great! I'd like to see an animation of the engine internals in motion because the description doesn't really give a good indication of how it works.
It doesn't sound yet as though there are any major drawbacks, but real-world testing will tell.
 
Discussion starter · #11 ·
Re: (juice)

Quote, originally posted by juice »
I dunno, a new type of crank and efficiency skyrockets by 60%? That seems way, way too optimistic.
And I wonder how they would extract output from a row of pairs of piston, i.e. an H6 or H8. How do you connect the middle cylinder with a crank shaft?
It seems like you could get an H4 to work by getting power from both sides.
Image

yea, you really didnt read very close.

i found an animated gif on their site, ill have to post it up.
 
It sounds very interesting, but just from reading the description I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly how it works. The basics of it seem right though. However their claims seem very optomistic (not that it surprises me).
 
Re: New engine design - Revetech (TurboWraith)

Quote, originally posted by TurboWraith »
heheh, funny - not a whole lot of intrest i guess. figured TCL engineers would come out of the woodwork for this one.

The armchair engineers run away when something is past the initial concept stage.
Image
 
Discussion starter · #18 ·
Re: (GsR)

Quote, originally posted by GsR »
does the site tell you how to pronounce it?

i dunno...ive been reading it as RevEtech (capital E is long with accent on tech).

mike brings up a good point, wear in the cylinder walls would be down, but those rotors could wear pretty hard.
 
Re: (TurboWraith)

Quote, originally posted by TurboWraith »

mike brings up a good point, wear in the cylinder walls would be down, but those rotors could wear pretty hard.

Wouldn't there be similar wear compared to a cam lobe? Without delving deep into speculations about forces exerted on the larger lobe versus the lobes on a cam, I can't imagine that there'd be much difference in wear.
 
Discussion starter · #20 ·
Re: (Vee-aR-6ix)

Quote, originally posted by Vee-aR-6ix »
Wouldn't there be similar wear compared to a cam lobe? Without delving deep into speculations about forces exerted on the larger lobe versus the lobes on a cam, I can't imagine that there'd be much difference in wear.

no, not really
a cam lobe is spinning to push a much less massive part. those rotors are being pummeled by an explosion and a much more massive part is doing the pummeling.
Image


but, they have working models, and they already have cars running with them, i would hope that they have it worked out somehow.
 
1 - 20 of 39 Posts