I've noticed a few here have had in the past MkIV R32 and now have a MKV GTI...
Just wondering out of interest which you like better?
Just wondering out of interest which you like better?
Quote, originally posted by aussie jimmy » |
r32 = ando - church of light gti = hillsong arena same religion, different perspectives.... ![]() |
Quote, originally posted by malliemcg » |
The lowrider pwns you all http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...earch= |
Quote, originally posted by looneyc » |
Well I didn't say (or mean to say it wasn't possible) but I figure that if I can perform a full throttle 1st gear 90 degree corner in the wet without understeer that is a pretty good indication. |
Quote, originally posted by Sloth » |
I don't think I realised how sloppy the Mk4 chassis was until I drove a Mk5. |
Quote, originally posted by sickindahead » |
The big difference however is in slamming in the anchors. The computer control on braking pressures is much more refined in the Mk5 and this along with the stiffer chassis results in far superior braking performance. |
Quote, originally posted by GizmoGTI » |
. I beleive the MkV GTI has the same r32 brakes - correct me if i'm wrong. |
Quote, originally posted by sickindahead » |
The overboost pump and pressure distribution control seems to work better on the MkV. When you signal the system for an emergency stop and the computer takes over the braking control there is a marked difference. The size of the disc or the calipers etc is not really relevant in an emergency stop. The big factors are the emergency braking system and the suspension and the chassis. I don't think my Mk4 even had a pump installed, only basic ABS. |