Just wondering what physical difference is between the two motors, if any. Thanks.
Quote, originally posted by shipo » |
Search is your friend. This is a very common question. |
Quote, originally posted by joeoregon » |
Here is some info that I sourced from an internal VW website. The site is a forumn for Dealership Employees to ask questions fielded from themselves and customers. BTW: the part numbers for the camshafts listed in ETKA from 2006-2008 2.5 engines are all the same thus ruling out anydifference in the cams. "The increase is primarily due to some computer "engine mapping" in addition to a few other minor, but effective hardware changes (FSI has not been added.) Please do not expect to add these changes on your own...it's more involved than just this list. Here's a list of some changes made to the 2.5L engine to increase the HP....I hope it makes sense....ENJOY!! The following on the engine changes were sent to me in German so I had to get someone to translate it for me...it's pretty close. - • valve-seat insert and valve guide - • oilcooler - • knock sensor and cam sensor - • In-/outlet valve - • no sec. air pump pipe for ULEV2 - • no two mass flywheel - • torsional dumper crankshaft PKO - • bearing pin transformation chain drive - • chain drive 1 (Crankshaft,dubblechainwheel, oilpump) - • change from roller chain to tooth-type chain - • crankshaft change to tooth-type chain - • manifold, because 125kw - • no t-sensor intake air " I hope you all find that interesting and helpful. |
Quote, originally posted by Nathan and his Rabbit » |
I asked this question a while back. http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=3834246 and the most reliable answer is this: Hope that helps. ![]() It's pretty complicated. IMHO, get some GIAC software, Carbino Intake and maybe an Exhaust and you'll be good to go. http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif Modified by Nathan and his Rabbit at 12:05 PM 9-15-2008 |
Quote, originally posted by pezzy84 » |
I think alot of the mechanical changes VW made were for refinenment reasons. The 150HP 2.5 is a noisy and peaky beast compared to the 170HP cars I have driven. The 170 HP cars I have driven are much more linear and more audibly pleasing than my '06. |
Indeed. My 2007 has lots of , er, ...character (noise, dead spots and a lump of torque in the middle of the band, but no top end) some would find annoying.
Quote, originally posted by Nathan and his Rabbit » I asked this question a while back.
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=3834246
and the most reliable answer is this:
Hope that helps.![]()
It's pretty complicated.
IMHO, get some GIAC software, Carbino Intake and maybe an Exhaust and you'll be good to go. http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif
Modified by Nathan and his Rabbit at 12:05 PM 9-15-2008
I think alot of the mechanical changes VW made were for refinenment reasons. The 150HP 2.5 is a noisy and peaky beast compared to the 170HP cars I have driven. The 170 HP cars I have driven are much more linear and more audibly pleasing than my '06.
Chip it, all that goes away. well, the dead spots and lumpiness anyways.Indeed. My 2007 has lots of , er, ...character (noise, dead spots and a lump of torque in the middle of the band, but no top end) some would find annoying.
No, early BGP/BGQ models were 150HP due to a combination of engine software and intake manifold runner length. All CBTA and CBUA (Cali emissions) are 170HP.Is it possible that the weaker engine is the California model with the tighter emissions standards? My 2008 VW Rabbit 2.5L 5-cylinder is the CBTA-M (non-California model) and the owner's manual says it has 170 hp.