Quote, originally posted by Mat_16V » |
my "2.slow" will stomp you 1.late |
Quote, originally posted by Sparknock » |
but your 2.no go will not stomp my 1.8
![]() Modified by Sparknock at 1:42 PM 10-29-2006 |
Quote, originally posted by wooly_964 » |
does anyone know if you can drop a 8v 2lt mkIII engine straight into a mkII? any suggestions please ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() only sensible people please |
Quote, originally posted by Gans » |
not a bad swap, 8vs are swell engines. but as the saying always goes, 16 valves are better than 8. |
Quote, originally posted by Gans » |
not a bad swap, 8vs are swell engines. but as the saying always goes, 16 valves are better than 8. |
Quote, originally posted by GolfGLSGirl » |
I'd also suggest a much newer engine (less miles!!) such as that out of a 2000 Golf/Jetta4 |
Quote, originally posted by eurojolf » |
16v are better on high end 8v are better in low end turbo both and i think the 16v comes out on top. i think the 8v are way less maintenance. my 16v has more issues than a crack whore. |
Quote, originally posted by a2coupe2a_ » |
x1000 - thats why im dumping thousands into my 1.8 8v - call me crazy but i like simple cars |