quote:[HR][/HR]no.a 3a block should be cheaper than ABA because of age[HR][/HR]
i went with an aba because it was a good deal @$250 and because it didnt need a rebuild. it was out of a '99 jetta, automatic and had 19k on it. a 3a might be cheaper initially but might need refreshing.
exactly.... and all of the wrecking yards i have been to so far i have never seen a 3a, but i have seen a ton of aba's... and they usualy dont want over 300 for them with low mileage.... heck some people will give them to you because they belive they suck so much... i got a aba complete with x-flow head tranny and the ecu cluster fuse block and all the wiring for $500
Just to clarify: 3A is the Audi, sometimes reffered to as "bubble block" and ABA's are the VW 2.0's right?? - does anyone have comparitive info (other than cost)?? I'm gonna do a big bore conversion someday... The good ol' 1.8 has a lot of life left in it though...
isnt the 3a similar to the 9a motors except for pistons? if so, other than the block height difference, i'd choose the ABA because of the higher rod ratio at 1.71 vs 1.55....i like the rev-ability plus the peakier torque curve..
I thought that with the shorter rods on the 3A, it'd be the rev happy one, and the ABA would be the stump-puller?
I'm going to try and find a 3A anyways as I plan on rebuilding whichever one I get, and would like to avoid any hassle I can (block off plates, distributor garbage, oil pump swaps, longer downpipes, etc)
1 - 20 of 55 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
A forum community dedicated to all Volkswagen owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, builds, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, new releases, and more!