...
i just think if i would have really thought about the timing that everything would have been 'better' for me if we had kids 5 years sooner.
so i would be turning approx 41 with a 7 and 9 yo, and 50 at end high school, instead of 58.
I'm 37 and my son is almost seven months old now. I can identify with that a bit.
Long, somewhat awkward story follows - apologies for that. I just find it hard to separate the past from the present. I'll address the OP's original question at the end. Everyone can skip to that if you like...
For a lot of reasons, the lateness couldn't be helped on my part. My wife and I got married in 2009, and due to the slow economy keeping me in a low paying job, we absolutely couldn't afford to start a family right away. In 2012, one of my older brothers had his first kid, and seeing my newborn niece gave me the push I needed to ignore finances. My wife and I decided to start a family and figure out the larger financial questions later. She got pregnant almost immediately, and we were overjoyed. Unfortunately, we lost the baby around 6 weeks into the pregnancy.
Doctors don't do any investigation on a single miscarriage. If you've been through it, you'll realize that it's far more common than you'd think and that a lot of people just don't talk about it. They told us to try again when we were ready and see what happened. Six months or so later we tried again, got pregnant almost immediately, and lost the second baby around the same point in the pregnancy.
In the following couple of years, we experienced several more losses (including twins), and saw a rotation of doctors, most of whom refused to do anything concrete to investigate or help us. Most of them just threw their hands in the air, shrugged their shoulders, wished us good luck, and shooed us out of their office. Of course, my wife had been compiling every scrap of data and evidence she could from all these doctors we'd seen. Finally, we met with a specialist and she presented all the info and her theory as to what was going on. The specialist looked at the info my wife had collected and scheduled an exploratory surgery. The specialist told us that if my wife was right, he could correct the problem as part of the diagnostic.
In early 2015, I took a day off work and took my wife in for the exploratory surgery. It was a quick procedure - under an hour. When she was in recovery, the specialist pulled me aside and told me that he thinks my wife was right and he was almost 100% sure he corrected the problem while he was in there. After she recovered, we decided to try again. In three years, we'd had five pregnancies end early and badly. Six children (including the aforementioned twins) we'll never meet.
We tried again. Once again, she got pregnant almost immediately. This time, the pregnancy was textbook perfect... to a point. Our son was due in mid April, 2016, but my wife's water broke in late February. The doctors were able to stabilize things, but the baby arrived six weeks early, in early March. Thankfully, he was healthy. Small, but healthy.
So, almost four years after first trying, we welcomed our son to the world. He's almost seven months old now. I'm watching him grow before my eyes and loving every minute of it. Sometimes, I get sad that I'll never get to see our first six grow up. I think about them a lot. They were very real to us. We haven't decided on timing (it's far too soon), but we're going to try for at least one more. The doctors think my son's earliness was a fluke and not related in any way to our previous losses.
the downsides to that i think is that older generations have a lot to share in experience and wisdom, which if they are dead... is just gone.
...
but its just something i think about now that the older generations of my family are passing/passed away.
the cohesion of the immediately family is a less because of the age gap, and WAY WAY less with the extended family now that various grandparents, aunts, and uncles are gone.
I have a much harder time identifying with this part. My parents are still around (my dad's 80 and my mom's almost 70). I'm glad they get to see my son once in a while, but compared to most essentially functional families, we're not very close. I can't really say they ever made much of an effort to impart wisdom, advice, or guidance of any sort on my brothers and I. Then again, from what I can gather, both sides of the family were of the mindset that children were to be seen, not heard. They weren't abusive - just more distant than I've learned is average.
My grandparents are all long gone, but I never once had any one-on-one time or a single conversation with any one of them. I'm sure some of that had to do with my mother's side of the family being in Canada and my father's side in Germany, but none of them were warm, gregarious people that I can gather. I have aunts, uncles, and cousins (once again, in Canada and Germany), none of whom I've seen or spoken to in any form in decades. The few times in my life that I met any of them, there was no effort on either side to get to know one another. They've made no effort to reach out to my brothers and me as the years have passed, and vice versa. At this point, they're strangers to me. Sometimes, I get a little jealous of people who grew up with close, extended families, but I feel no natural pull to get to know any of my extended family, nor to involve them in my son's life. Once again, I realize that's not quite normal.