[FastGTi]

Dyno.....doesn't make much sense

I don't have a scanner, but I'll try to take a pic of the graph asap...
175.3hp @ 6000 rpm ..not bad
232.2ft/lbs @ 3750 rpm.....doesn't this seem a bit high?
Anyhow, I'm quite chuffed

Mods are a APR 93 octane, and 3" atp downpipe (no cat)

 

[flanders]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (FastGTi)

yikes...nice torque!

I think that number is about right with the 3" dp.

 

[FastGTi]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (flanders)

quote:[HR][/HR]yikes...nice torque!

I think that number is about right with the 3" dp.[HR][/HR]​

The graph isn't exactly linear, but I also don't have a cat and I think it's the culprit....

 

[scud6661]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (FastGTi)

i've never quite seen anyone complain about dyno number being too high

but isn't ur hp number a bit low with the highest hp chip avaliable, plus a 3" DP?

 

[scr2000]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (scud6661)

Your hp should be about 15 pts higher. Your torque is right on the money. My completely stock '02 GTI just pulled a 166.4 hp and a 176 ft-lb on a dynojet. There was a guy with a Garret v10 and EVO CAI and his best pull was 191 hp with the torque somewhere around 240 ft-lb. I'd be kinda sad if I were you. Sorry.

 

[FastGTi]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (scud6661)

quote:[HR][/HR]i've never quite seen anyone complain about dyno number being too high

but isn't ur hp number a bit low with the highest hp chip avaliable, plus a 3" DP?[HR][/HR]​

See that's what I first thought, but it seemed everyone was putting out low numbers. A modded S4 was only putting around 259 whp.
Plus I've got some weird stuff going on in the curve check it out

[Modified by FastGTi, 12:56 PM 4-7-2002]

 

[Jman5000]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (FastGTi)

On my last dyno, I had the same mods
PLUS
Evo intake, no resonator, FD exhaust.
Took the HP to 199 and kept the torque. Consider a bigger catback.

 

[VWTornado]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (FastGTi)

Well, I have the same torque, but 25 more HP, so something is weird. Thats nice torque, but weird HP.

 

[smd3]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (FastGTi)

Seems to me like Mustang Dyno's are always a bit lower than dynojets. I don't think you can compare a Mustang to a dynojet. And don't forget to take into account temps, altitude, humidity.. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your numbers.
Of course, if this thing about the VCT turns out to be true then who knows what to believe about anything.

 

[20VT*J4]

Re: Dyno.....doesn't make much sense (smd3)

quote:[HR][/HR]Seems to me like Mustang Dyno's are always a bit lower than dynojets. I don't think you can compare a Mustang to a dynojet [HR][/HR]​

you beat me to it. From what i've seen, mustang dyno's are quite a bit more conservative than a dynojet.