[WAUOla]

Made sticky?

 

[PerL]

Re: (WAUOla)

Quote, originally posted by WAUOla »

Made sticky?

No, it used to be a sticky, but now it is linked in the new FAQ that is stuck at the top.

 

[WAUOla]

Re: FAQ: UrQuattro vs Sport Quattro vs Coupe quattro (StormChaser)

This thread itself should be a sticky! http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif

 

[#1 S T U N N A]

Re: FAQ: UrQuattro vs Sport Quattro vs Coupe quattro (StormChaser)

Pardon my stupid question, but what does "Urq" mean?

 

[URQ]

Re: FAQ: UrQuattro vs Sport Quattro vs Coupe quattro (#1 S T U N N A)

"The Original Quattro"

 

[#1 S T U N N A]

Re: FAQ: UrQuattro vs Sport Quattro vs Coupe quattro (URQ)

thx! http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif

 

[PerL]

I'd like to bring this thread back to life, by correcting myself. I wrote (6 years ago) on page 1 that there is one Sport quattro here in my town that was imported from USA, and that I believed that it was one of the original US_spec vehicles. Since then, I have seen the car several times, and I have even seen the VIN number. It turns out that htis car is NOT one of the cars originally sold to USA. It has chassis number 56, and was originally sold to Germany, so it was a US grey market car. It is still owned by the same person who imported it from Florida.

Here's a pic of the actual car, #56

 

[vagbahn]

I sort of looked through this thread but didn't see mention of what I've recently discovered. The SWB quattro appears not to be a coupe but a 4000 quattro with a coupe rear end hacked onto it .. note the rooflines