But you missed the while point! They are not selling you the car, so you have no financial risk. They understand that this is the issue with a new car company, so they allow you to “subscribe” to the car, and you can give it back at any time. 30,000 miles allowed every year, and no long-term contract, so you can hand the car back at any time. This keeps new people from worrying about getting stuck with a car. The company and their banking partner will take all the financial risk. If you think about it, it’s genius, because it allows people to take on this new car company’s product. Tesla kind of does this under the radar by buying back and controlling the used car market a bit. Fisker learned from the last time. People don’t want to take the leap. By allowing people to take no risk, it should cause many people to jump in... which then is a self-fulfilling prophecy for ensuring that more people can have a positive experience.How do you feel about buying a car from a "new" manufacturer, or in the case of Fisker, as start-up with a history of failure on its record?
I am not criticizing the company, the car, or your purchase decision.
I just don't think I'd have the courage to make a major purchase from a company that is new. (What if the company goes under? What happens to the resale value/warranty/etc...?)
It’s not meaningful, but it is a small start to a technology that can improve over time. An extra “free” few miles can’t hurt. I have the solar roof on my Fisker Karma, and it’s intent in 2011 was mainly to provide power to run a cooling fan on hot days to keep the battery cool. It does mostly nothing, and the company first offered it as an option, but virtually every customer of the first units ordered the option, so they made it standard on the 3000 or so produced. There exists no Karma without it. I think now on the new Fiskers it’s a design, aesthetic, and conversation piece that can someday grow into something more as battery and PV panel technology evolves. Gotta start somewhere! The first car air conditioners didn’t do much, either. Everything evolves.So... 1k miles a year from the solar panel or 2.7 miles a day. That's almost useless. I want to see the math for solar panel charging range (even on a sunny California outing) vs the same vehicle's range without the weight of the solar panel.
The first humans didn't do much either.The first car air conditioners didn’t do much, either. Everything evolves.
What is wrong with using sustainable interior materials? Leather is a ****ty material for car interiors, it's idiotic that animals die for something so subpar.Interesting. That fits my needs almost ideally. Has me thinking hard...
Also, vegan this vegan that :facepalm:
Keep readingWhat is wrong with using sustainable interior materials? Leather is a ****ty material for car interiors, it's idiotic that animals die for something so subpar.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with using sustainable materials made from things other than animals. I think that would be fantastic.What is wrong with using sustainable interior materials? Leather is a ****ty material for car interiors, it's idiotic that animals die for something so subpar.
Why come up with another name for it when one already exists?There's absolutely nothing wrong with using sustainable materials made from things other than animals. I think that would be fantastic.
Do. Not. Market. It. As. Vegan.
Just stop.
Call it something else.
Because I'm not chewing on the f*cking car, that's why.Why come up with another name for it when one already exists?
Much like I said to Smooremin, veganism isn't just about eating. It extends way past that into the use of animal products in general.Because I'm not chewing on the f*cking car, that's why.
No, I get it, it's a lifestyle.Much like I said to Smooremin, veganism isn't just about eating. It extends way past that.
That being said, both of you are probably representative of the general population's knowledge regarding vegans. I was the same way before I moved to Seattle. :laugh:
As has already been mentioned, vegan isn't just about eating. You think that someone who doesn't eat meat for ethical reasons wants to wear it?Because I'm not chewing on the f*cking car, that's why.
So by calling it something other than Vegan, they will not buy it??And, let's be honest, you know Fisker is targeting these kind of people with a full EV.
For a single day, probably but like Dave said you need to start somewhere. For the whole year that's pulling three full recharges off of the grid per car. Again not ground breaking but it's a start for people who keep saying that the grid can't handle all the new EVs that are coming. Multiply that over many cars and it does make a difference. And who knows. Maybe as the tech evolves they will develop to provide more of the day to day charge.So... 1k miles a year from the solar panel or 2.7 miles a day. That's almost useless. I want to see the math for solar panel charging range (even on a sunny California outing) vs the same vehicle's range without the weight of the solar panel.
Don't you bring Subaru's into this.Do they make interior materials that are CrossFit friendly?
Oh no.For a single day, probably but like Dave said you need to start somewhere. For the whole year that's pulling three full recharges off of the grid per car. Again not ground breaking but it's a start for people who keep saying that the grid can't handle all the new EVs that are coming.
This thread was already doomed when the allroad owners started chiming in.Oh no.
You said grid.
This thread is doomed.
YOU are the only one unhappy about the word vegan. Why should the rest of the English speaking world stop using that word?So by calling it something other than Vegan, they will not buy it??
Again, call it animal friendly, and everyone is happy. Whats the big deal about that?