Yes, he said he's very aware of the contradictions and double the price or whatever. He doesn't care. He hates the Prius experience
“I have no idea what’s going on in this industry right now,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said during his company’s capital markets event Monday. He referenced electric vehicles coming out with 450–500 miles of range, including “a three-row crossover” announced today that was likely the new electric Cadillac Escalade.
Higher ranges will necessitate bigger batteries, he noted, adding, “These batteries are huge.”
“If you have those kinds of batteries, you will not make money,” Farley said during today’s event. “So we’ve got to start talking about the size of batteries for the range, the efficiency.”
Yes, he said he's very aware of the contradictions and double the price or whatever. He doesn't care. He hates the Prius experienceThis makes no sense, the 5 series is significantly more expensive while the Prius has three times the EV range and once depleted will get twice the mileage.
they could have been really cheap if you part share the crap put of that platform all while offering the same sausage in 6 different lengthsOffering more body styles would have made the Volt even more expensive. Business wise the best move would have been to keep the pricing as is (remember that it started around $38K) and just make it a crossover. Repeat after me, Americans don't like small cars.
GM offered a wide range of small cars for damn near half the Volt's price and they still all failed. People don't want American small cars. There's nothing GM could have done to save the Volt.they could have been really cheap if you part share the crap put of that platform all while offering the same sausage in 6 different lengths
yeah i get it; gotta make sure you offer very large vehicles, which GM definitely does, but this was the Volt; a small battery EV with a range extender. It could have been so much more successful than it was.
I'd rearrange this sentence to say the following:People don't want American small cars.
But those that do tend not to want American small cars.I'd rearrange this sentence to say the following:
"American people don't want small cars."
You could also say that "People who want American cars don't want small cars."But those that do tend not to want American small cars.
Still needs oil changes, still needs air filters, spark plugs, transmission, etc and it still has a "check engine" light. You're buying two powertrains up front instead of one. Ends up being a very complex vehicle.Honestly the more we go the more I get convinced plug in hybrids are the future and not EVs. They have electric range that is long enough for daily EV only use but the gas motor kicks in for road trips with an overall fuel economy that is double comparable gas only cars. Where is the compromise?
You have to haul all the ICE kit and kaboodle around (you don’t get stuff like a frunk) and maintain the ICE. You typically have much less power available in EV mode, and the acceleration in combined mode won’t have the endless wave of torque an EV has.Honestly the more we go the more I get convinced plug in hybrids are the future and not EVs. They have electric range that is long enough for daily EV only use but the gas motor kicks in for road trips with an overall fuel economy that is double comparable gas only cars. Where is the compromise?
I approve both amendments.
The people who complain about EV range are going to complain about EV range no matter what that range actually is
Also, it’s only very recently that you see cars that have that sort of range ICE or Electric. Before most compact cars came with 10-12 gallon tanks …that’s not going much more than 300 miles even with driving all highway miles. Unless you get a truck with a 26 gallon tank or a hybrid , 400 mile range is pretty uncommon.
QFT. the range anxiety and charging time complainers aren't going to buy them anyways. My M235 is averaging 300mi with a 12gal fill up. and I. couldn't. care. less. I just need a manual."But every 3-5 years I need to drive from northern bum**** maine to some obscure corner of Idaho, towing three boats and a horse trailer. EV's just aren't realistic."
While I agree to an extent, for me the thrill/fun would be gone. I'm very into them and totally understand the mechanicals involved, and I love the upkeep on them, too (yes, I mean tinkering with points and whatnot).I just need a manual.
give me something like this:
I've seen a small exception to that, incidentally also with a Porsche. The Taycan has a two speed transmission.An electric motor coupled to a 4-speed? You normally just leave it in third and drive the car with the one gear, as the two don't need each other. You don't need a reverse gear, either. It's just a legacy apparatus at that point.
PHEVs are definitely the present (stop gap), but we cannot rely on ICE for much longer, so they cannot be the future. They are far more complex and expensive to maintain and some automakers claim that some actually create more upstream emissions than BEV due to complexity.Honestly the more we go the more I get convinced plug in hybrids are the future and not EVs. They have electric range that is long enough for daily EV only use but the gas motor kicks in for road trips with an overall fuel economy that is double comparable gas only cars. Where is the compromise?
"but we cannot rely on ICE for much longer"PHEVs are definitely the present (stop gap), but we cannot rely on ICE for much longer, so they cannot be the future. They are far more complex and expensive to maintain and some automakers claim that some actually create more upstream emissions than BEV due to complexity.
The regulations will also phase them out over the next decade or two.
Even without the hybrid systems, ICE vehicles have hit Rube Goldberg levels of complexity to meet fuel economy, crash safety, and emissions demands, while not lightening or shrinking them.PHEVs are definitely the present (stop gap), but we cannot rely on ICE for much longer, so they cannot be the future. They are far more complex and expensive to maintain and some automakers claim that some actually create more upstream emissions than BEV due to complexity.