VW Vortex - Volkswagen Forum banner

Technical: Oxygen sensor discussion (planar vs. heated thimble)

1 reading
6.9K views 12 replies 6 participants last post by  VWinA  
#1 ·
I propose a question to the more technically minded individuals:
Can we substitute the newer "Planar" technology oxygen sensors into an ABA OBDII situation? Everything I've read seems to point that this would be feasable and would sligltly improve performance/reliability/emissoins. Planar oxygen sensors 1st started appearing on the 98 Beetle and most 2.0L engines that followed. The Bosch descriptions of these sensors state that they are an evolution to the older thimble style sensor, not a completely different animal like a "wideband" is. Here's their descriptions for both:
Heated Thimble: These sensors were introduced by Bosch in 1982 and function in the same manner as the unheated thimble, however inside the thimble is a special heating element that brings the sensor up to operating temperature in about 30-60 seconds. The additional wires to power the heater- typically a total of 3-4 wires (dependent on grounding scenario) can identify these sensors.
Image

Planar: This sensor was introduced by Bosch in 1997 and also uses the zirconia ceramic sensing technology, but placed in a more compact thin flat shape (hence the name) instead of a thimble or conical shape. This allows the sensor to be smaller and lighter. They also require less electrical power as the heater is integrated into the smaller sensing element. By model year 2004, planar oxygen sensors are expected to account for over 30% of all new oxygen sensor applications and by 2007 for over 50% of new oxygen sensors. These sensors also have only four wires.
Image

If there is any obvious difference, it would be that the heater circuit will draw less current. In this case, it shouldn't be an issue. In the revrese case though (putting an older sensor into a planar equipped car), the heater would draw more current and may blow out the heater circuit.
They also list specifics on the wiring:
Q. I have a Bosch original equipment 4-wire sensor. What do the wire colors mean?

A. All Bosch 4-wire sensors have a black wire for the signal, a gray wire for ground and 2 white wires for the heater.
So what does everyone think? Has anyone actually attempted this? Is there a reference site I could visit just to be certain that the signal voltages will be the same? Given both sensors for free would you be tempted to try the newer technology?
 
#5 ·
Re: (vasillalov)

bump for this discussion...interesting thought as well...
The planar sensors are also known as "wideband" sensors while older sensors are "narrowband" ? IS this correct?
The most important question is will our older ECUs (A3) have the programming to recognize the additional data and ranges supplied by the planar sensors .......


Modified by racercx2 at 6:20 PM 8-27-2006
 
#6 ·
Re: (racercx2)

Quote, originally posted by racercx2 »
The planar sensors are also known as "wideband" sensors while older sensors are "narrowband" ? IS this correct?

Actually, it isn't correct. I used to think the same thing. The planar sensors are just an "evolution" of the original oxs with some improved technology. A true wideband uses a reference signal (outside air) to determine the A/F ratio much more accurately.
Quote, originally posted by racercx2 »
The most important question is will our older ECUs (A3) have the programming to recognize the additional data and ranges supplied by the planar sensors .......

That is part of my question. Does the signal range of the Planar ones exceed that of an older model. I know it's a slightly faster response and draws far less power, but is the range different? In the case of a wideband, it's obvious that the A3 ECU would not accept it's input (and would probably blow out!).
Who out there is an ECU guru or an EE who can shed some light on the subject? Does anyone out there have a spare bung they can screw in a planar sensor and measure the outputs?
Image
Hmm, that leads me to a possible suggestion! Do aftermarket A/F gauges work proprely on AEG equipped vehicles? If so, then the voltage ranges will be compatible. (Since both the ECU and the A/F gauge will look for 0-1 volt)
 
#7 ·
Re: (SlowCorrado)

Well the best way to determine this is to do some logging. I can do an MK4 log and someone else can do a log from the MK3. I guess we need tempreature and voltage. Then we plot both in a graph...
 
G
#8 ·
Re: Technical: Oxygen sensor discussion (SlowCorrado)

sounds to me like the big difference is just packaging
its smaller and lighter...makes it easier to ship large quantities to mfg's as well as auto parts stores. Its more compact, so its easier to install in tighter locations as found in newer cars..
better in terms of output? Same crap, its still a heated narrow band. Your car will run no better or worse.
 
#10 ·
Re: Technical: Oxygen sensor discussion (Steve@USRT)

Quote, originally posted by Steve@USRT »

better in terms of output? Same crap, its still a heated narrow band. Your car will run no better or worse.

I would love to trust god but I still wonder...
I wonder how does the response of the narrow band affect the ECU. From what I remember, on obd2 cars one of the O2 sensors is used to check the Cat and the other is used in real time to give fueling adjustments. I know that sometimes an old O2 sensor affects performance negatively. Is it because of slow response? If so then maybe we could benefit from a faster responding 02 sensor.
Image
 
G
#11 ·
Re: Technical: Oxygen sensor discussion (VWinA)

Quote, originally posted by VWinA »
I would love to trust god but I still wonder...
I wonder how does the response of the narrow band affect the ECU. From what I remember, on obd2 cars one of the O2 sensors is used to check the Cat and the other is used in real time to give fueling adjustments. I know that sometimes an old O2 sensor affects performance negatively. Is it because of slow response? If so then maybe we could benefit from a faster responding 02 sensor.
Image

Both sensors, are like on/off switches (vs wideband 5 wire) for the most part. The secondary O2 simply reads until it sees that it's finally detecting the cat no longer working (or a really effed up mixture). It's not going to react any faster or slower then the thimble type. Same goes for the front. Even Bosch says it, it's the same guts, just layed out differently.
 
#12 ·
Re: Technical: Oxygen sensor discussion (Steve@USRT)

I do understand what Steve is saying. It pretty much answers my question too. There seems to be no issue with electrical differences. Although you only get a "narrowband" signal, there are other benefits.
Bosch redesigned the sensor to be more efficient, have a faster response, be lighter, last longer, be less prone to contamination and (probably most importantly) draw less current.
I would hazard a guess that this IS an upgrade to any vehicle equipped with the older "thimble" style oxs. To this end, I'm going to wire it into my OBDII ABA swap I'm currently doing. (unless someone can convince me otherwise)