Re: VR6 dynos (SilverBora)
Stock VR6...144.57 HP???
Stock VR6...144.57 HP???
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Re: VR6 dynos (SilverBora)
![]()
Re: VR6 dynos (user name unknown)
Less smoothing, better numbers. Same results, great top end.
![]()
*edit*
From same data files
[Modified by SilverBora, 7:45 AM 2-7-2002]
Less smoothing, better numbers. Same results, great top end.
*edit*
From same data files
[Modified by SilverBora, 7:45 AM 2-7-2002]
Re: VR6 dynos (Knockwurst)
Stock VR6-
![]()
The SAE corrected numbers are 157 hp and 175 lb-ft of torque (works out to ~180 hp and ~200 lb-ft at the flywheel with 12.5% loss) ... the plotted ones are standard correction.
Stock VR6-
The SAE corrected numbers are 157 hp and 175 lb-ft of torque (works out to ~180 hp and ~200 lb-ft at the flywheel with 12.5% loss) ... the plotted ones are standard correction.
Re: VR6 dynos (pal)
Baseline dyno(first run in blue print was a freak run because the car wasn't set straight and I didn't get to finish the run. The one in red was the good baseline run):
![]()
Upsolute dyno:
![]()
Garrett dyno:
![]()
Upsolute vs. Garrett--HP and Torque (Upsolute is runs "Mark B. 003" and "004," Garrett is runs "Mark B. 005" and "006"):
![]()
Upsolute and Garrett air/fuel ratio (Upsolute is runs "Mark B. 003" and "004," Garrett is runs "Mark B. 005" and "006"):
![]()
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=119262
http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif
[Modified by NeoJetta, 8:55 AM 2-7-2002]
[Modified by NeoJetta, 8:55 AM 2-7-2002]
[Modified by NeoJetta, 8:58 AM 2-7-2002]
Baseline dyno(first run in blue print was a freak run because the car wasn't set straight and I didn't get to finish the run. The one in red was the good baseline run):
Upsolute dyno:
Image uploading. Refresh page to view
Garrett dyno:
Image uploading. Refresh page to view
Upsolute vs. Garrett--HP and Torque (Upsolute is runs "Mark B. 003" and "004," Garrett is runs "Mark B. 005" and "006"):
Image uploading. Refresh page to view
Upsolute and Garrett air/fuel ratio (Upsolute is runs "Mark B. 003" and "004," Garrett is runs "Mark B. 005" and "006"):
Image uploading. Refresh page to view
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=119262
http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif
[Modified by NeoJetta, 8:55 AM 2-7-2002]
[Modified by NeoJetta, 8:55 AM 2-7-2002]
[Modified by NeoJetta, 8:58 AM 2-7-2002]
6
Re: VR6 dynos (SilverBora)
Hmm
![]()
Going to do a VR6 Swap!
Hmm
Going to do a VR6 Swap!
Re: VR6 dynos (ROCKRLR)
Hey Rock, can you explain the difference between the STD and SAE correction factors? Thx. http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif
quote:[HR][/HR]1st off SilverBora has posted some dyno plots I showed him. I forgot to ask him NOT to post in the Vortex since they would not pass scrutiny here. Viper run was done in a VR6 Jetta different than the one doing the stock and UP runs. I have dynoed my car prior to the Viper (the numbers were very close to NeoJetta SAE Upsolute run) but I dont have the data file to make a plot.
Stock and UP data were taken by Neojetta in his car. Viper run is my car. I used SAE correction and smoothing factor '5' for the 1st plot he posted, and then smoothing factor '1' (more jagged).
Knockwurst dyno is also SAE corrected, but he has no stock run.
PAL and NeoJetta plots are STD corrected. I have observed that STD correction numbers are higher than SAE corrected ones. NeoJetta stock STD run is 148.2HP, same SAE run is 146.01HP.
PAL numbers are way too high. I would redyno at a different place just to make sure, and ask for SAE corrected numbers.
I can redo the plots posted by SilverBora using STD correction.[HR][/HR]
Pal does have the highest numbers I've seen on a stock VR. Stock and UP data were taken by Neojetta in his car. Viper run is my car. I used SAE correction and smoothing factor '5' for the 1st plot he posted, and then smoothing factor '1' (more jagged).
Knockwurst dyno is also SAE corrected, but he has no stock run.
PAL and NeoJetta plots are STD corrected. I have observed that STD correction numbers are higher than SAE corrected ones. NeoJetta stock STD run is 148.2HP, same SAE run is 146.01HP.
PAL numbers are way too high. I would redyno at a different place just to make sure, and ask for SAE corrected numbers.
I can redo the plots posted by SilverBora using STD correction.[HR][/HR]
Hey Rock, can you explain the difference between the STD and SAE correction factors? Thx. http://****************.com/smile/emthup.gif
VR6 Stock on DynoJet
![]()
Re: VR6 dynos (ROCKRLR)
![]()
quote:[HR][/HR]Knockwurst dyno is also SAE corrected, but he has no stock run.[HR][/HR]
My best stock dyno was 157.1HP and 166.2 FT.- LBS. I figured it wasn’t even worth mentioning
Re: VR6 dynos (Knockwurst)
Meant no stock run on the plot you provided
![]()
A blue bird told me you are planning to go FI, IM me about it
![]()
Meant no stock run on the plot you provided
A blue bird told me you are planning to go FI, IM me about it
2
Re: VR6 dynos (amead)
Question: why do oeb's HP and torque curves intersect at around 4650rpm while in all others they intersect at 5200?
![]()
![]()
Question: why do oeb's HP and torque curves intersect at around 4650rpm while in all others they intersect at 5200?
2
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
