VW Vortex - Volkswagen Forum banner
1 - 20 of 95 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
87,826 Posts
2015
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
353 Posts
1992-1994, they are the same. The 1992-1996 (3rd gen) you will hear are the best from anyone that has owned multiple generations of camrys. The 95-96 is called the gen 3.5 and it received a minor facelift, but at the same time the interior was cheapened slighly, and it had no more features than the year before.

The 1994 got the all aluminum 3.0 V6 too. It was one of the most quiet, refined and smooth engines out at the time, also one of the most reliable. The 4 cylinder is just as reliable but not as smooth and refined, but it is easier to work on.

The Gen 2's are probably just as good as the gen 3's as far as build quality and reliablity. But are almost all rust buckets though and the gen 3 is much more modern and comfortable. The v6 was not as good either.

Gen 4 camrys had the sludge problem, not a problem at all actually if the oil has been changed, but on a 10 plus year old car you cant be sure. They really have just been downhill from there as far as quality until the most recent generation.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
87,826 Posts
any particular reason?
The 1992 was the first year for the model generation. Hmm. But the 1994 model got a passenger side airbag and a more potent V6.

Many think that generation of Camry was the last Camry made to be the best it could be without cost cutting (old Toyota durability with modern design). In 5 speed V6 SE form it was actually a driver's car.
 

·
Registered
2003 Honda S2000, 2018 Subaru BRZ, 2015 GX460
Joined
·
18,502 Posts
Actually some useful info in this thread...I was expecting this to turn into a "what type of hemorrhagic fever do you want?" thread. I too have heard then gen 3 4cyl are the most bombproof.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,748 Posts
The 1992 was the first year for the model generation. Hmm. But the 1994 model got a passenger side airbag and a more potent V6.

Many think that generation of Camry was the last Camry made to be the best it could be without cost cutting (old Toyota durability with modern design). In 5 speed V6 SE form it was actually a driver's car.
Didn't the V6 engines have a tendency to blow headgaskets?

Despite the supposed cost-cutting, I would take a brand new Camry Hybrid over all the others.

If you live in an area that doesn't use road salt, a solid argument could be made for the original '83 Camry, of which there are plenty still rolling around.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
353 Posts
The 1992 was the first year for the model generation. Hmm. But the 1994 model got a passenger side airbag and a more potent V6.

Many think that generation of Camry was the last Camry made to be the best it could be without cost cutting (old Toyota durability with modern design). In 5 speed V6 SE form it was actually a driver's car.
Outside of the Lexus LS400, toyota spent more money developing the 1992 camry than any other car it has ever made. It was also the first car they designed using CAD.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
353 Posts
Didn't the V6 engines have a tendency to blow headgaskets?

Despite the supposed cost-cutting, I would take a brand new Camry Hybrid over all the others.

If you live in an area that doesn't use road salt, a solid argument could be made for the original '83 Camry, of which there are plenty still rolling around.
The earlier 88-93 v6's with the iron block and aluminum head did. But in 1994 it got a new all aluminum motor which has no issues really.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
87,826 Posts
Didn't the V6 engines have a tendency to blow headgaskets?

Despite the supposed cost-cutting, I would take a brand new Camry Hybrid over all the others.

If you live in an area that doesn't use road salt, a solid argument could be made for the original '83 Camry, of which there are plenty still rolling around.
In term of just durability/reliability for a four banger auto sedan, the later EFI 2nd gen Camry takes my vote.

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
87,826 Posts
Outside of the Lexus LS400, toyota spent more money developing the 1992 camry than any other car it has ever made. It was also the first car they designed using CAD.
And I believe that.
The 2nd gen Camry was a success and Toyota's reliable image was solid by the late 80s.
But they needed to compete with the big dogs (us domestic sedans- namely the extremely popular, good looking and driving Taurus), and in order to do that they really needed a sedan that competed at the midsize sedan level without compromise (power, room, ride, features, looks, refinement).

^

And it is good to know for 94 the V6 head gasket issue was addressed.
(you guys act like replacing a head gasket is some impossible repair)
I keep an eye out for 5 speed manual V6 camries of this gen.
Fuel economy is so-so, but for beater money you can have a really good car.
The 5 speed V6 626 was more enthusiast tuned... but I bet the Camry will hold up much better.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,501 Posts
The 98 I had was pretty bullet proof...I am also extremely impressed with its rust resistance. As a Canadian car, with basically 0 care from me(I took over from my parents from 2005 on, sold last year to a coworker who still drives it), with lots of scrapes and scratches that exposed metal. The rusts were just confined to those area with damage....The car was basically just a put gas in it and go, and change oil every 10k km. Brakes were serviced at some point, some control-arm bushing were replaced....and the car gets 30MPG no matter how fast (or slow) you drive...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,259 Posts
The one that kept all it's letters on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,692 Posts
let's say based on features, performance and durability... what SINGLE year is the best year and why?
Well, my wife is a big time Camry fan. She bought a '91 Camry right out of college, then I bought her a '96 Avalon and I replaced that with a '99 Camry and then I replaced that Camry with an '08 Accord.

I put A LOT of seat time in these cars. For durability, I would say the '99 was the most durable followed closely by the '96 Avalon (which I believe was just a stretched '92-96 Camry.) Neither one of those cars ever had anything break, ever, over several years and miles of ownership. In fact, I don't think I ever changed so much as a light bulb in ether of those cars. Not a belt, not a battery, nothing. We put 100k on the '96 Avalon and just over 100k on the '99 Camry.

However, having said all that, I think by a long shot my favorite of them all was the '91 Camry she had. She put 100k miles on it and was ready to get rid of it. I loved that car so much that I traded in my beloved (but terribly unreliable) '93 Ford Probe GT (stick) for her automatic, 4 cylinder, stripped down, base model Camry. . . not an LE, not a DX, a base model - cloth interior, roll up windows, no cruise control, nada. It did have AC, rear window defroster and an oem cassette deck. I held on to it and drove it for years and put an additional 125k miles on it. When I donated it to charity it had 225k miles, a lot of rust but it still ran like it did new.

It was just such a nicely balanced car though. I loved the shape, the size, pretty much everything. I put in batteries, did brakes every 80 or 90k miles. A set of tires would last two terms of a president, cheap, cheap, cheap to own and operate. Oh and speaking of tires, plain old all season tires would get you through the worst Indiana snowstorms. Outstanding snow car.

Super easy to work on. One time the starter went out. I walked into Autozone, bought a replacement, asked the guy behind the counter if he knew where it was. He had no clue. So I asked "can you at least tell me is it on top of the motor or under it somewhere?" He said "oh it says here it's on top." So I held up the starter up and just looked around the engine bay for something that looked like it - found it - replaced it maybe 20 minutes.

I loved the cloth interior too in that car. It was like a really rugged tweed fabric. It cleaned up easily and wore really well. Overall, I think the best Camry ever or at least my favorite Toyota of the bunch we've owned. . . and I say that because they stopped being fun after that one. :thumbup:


Kind of looked like this one - notice it didn't have hub cabs even! :) :

 
1 - 20 of 95 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top