Re: z-engineering vs eurotech (Rensselaer Corrado)
re Z-Charger: Actually, 250 CHP for the OBD1 Corrado is a bit optimistic. I heard of that number for the newer VR6's, but was warned ahead of time that the HP gain would be much lower for the C. In my case, the car dynoed at 187 to the wheel, so I am assuming about 210 to the crank. The Z-charger is the right set-up for my case, being "mechanically challenged"
, but mostly because my C is my daily driver, and I did not want a lot of mods to the engine itself. Aside from reliability and maintenance issues, I plan to swap in a new 24-valve VR6 when the day comes that he needs a new engine. Hopefully by then there will be a Z-charger for that engine, too! Something else to consider is the extra mods you need to do when adding horsepower. With the Z, you really only have to beef up the suspension. But with any more power, you would need to add a limited-slip differential, the best wheels and tires you can afford, bigger brakes. So as usual, it boils down to how much do you want to spend? One more thing: the Z charger's chip is not really 100% there yet for the Corrado. Low revs are cursed with stumbling and surging. They are working on a fix that involves the MAF sensor and new software, it's coming "any day now." Once that fix is available, I would recommend the Z whole-heartedly. Even an increase of only 35-40 CHP is enough to catapault the Corrado to light speed! (ok, slight exaggeration.) Hope that helps.
[Modified by CorradoCat, 12:10 PM 2-12-2002]